Comments for Since it is not ...
https://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com
... we simply try to teach mathematics.Sat, 07 Sep 2013 02:32:17 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/Comment on The central amenability constant of a finite group: Part 3 of n by The central amenability constant of a finite group: Part 4 of n | Since it is not ...
https://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/2013/06/30/the-central-amenability-constant-of-a-finite-group-part-3-of-n/comment-page-1/#comment-503
Sat, 07 Sep 2013 02:32:17 +0000http://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/?p=647#comment-503[…] significant cancellation. Indeed, this is exactly what happens in the case of an abelian group: see the previous post for […]
]]>Comment on The central amenability constant of a finite group: Part 1 of n by The central amenability constant of a finite group: Part 4 of n | Since it is not ...
https://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/the-central-amenability-constant-of-a-finite-group-part-1-of-n/comment-page-1/#comment-502
Sat, 07 Sep 2013 02:25:35 +0000http://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/?p=567#comment-502[…] as mentioned in the first post of this series, we can do better when it comes to , which is the original quantity of interest. This was done in […]
]]>Comment on The central amenability constant of a finite group: Part 1 of n by The central amenability constant of a finite group: Part 3 of n | Since it is not ...
https://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/the-central-amenability-constant-of-a-finite-group-part-1-of-n/comment-page-1/#comment-485
Sun, 30 Jun 2013 10:16:50 +0000http://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/?p=567#comment-485[…] OK, back to the story of the central amenability constant. I’ll take the opportunity to re-tread some of the ground from the first post. […]
]]>Comment on So what was Dr. Blind’s question, then? by Tale « Log24
https://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/2013/01/24/so-what-was-dr-blinds-question-then/comment-page-1/#comment-475
Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:12:06 +0000http://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/?p=557#comment-475[…] A math weblog discussed this passage on January 24, 2013. For related superhero alliances, see this weblog on that same date. […]
]]>Comment on Kadison-Singer: solved? by The Kadison-Singer Conjecture has beed Proved by Adam Marcus, Dan Spielman, and Nikhil Srivastava | Combinatorics and more
https://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/2013/06/18/kadison-singer-solved/comment-page-1/#comment-472
Fri, 21 Jun 2013 15:50:12 +0000http://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/?p=636#comment-472[…] mathematics of the conjecture with ten interesting comments on the proof by Orr Shalit, and another nice post on Yemon Choi’s […]
]]>Comment on Kadison-Singer: solved? by Orr Shalit
https://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/2013/06/18/kadison-singer-solved/comment-page-1/#comment-469
Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:21:07 +0000http://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/?p=636#comment-469Thanks for bringing it up. I saw the preprint on the arxiv mailing list, but had no time to look deeper. Looking forward to your updates on the solution.
]]>Comment on Interlude: an “analyst” does some finite group theory by Yemon Choi
https://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/2013/06/14/interlude-an-analyst-does-some-finite-group-theory/comment-page-1/#comment-467
Sun, 16 Jun 2013 00:22:51 +0000http://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/?p=619#comment-467On second thoughts, that talk mentioning “just-P” groups must have been 2004 or 2005, not 2006. I *think* it was given by John Wilson but my memory is very hazy here.
]]>Comment on The central amenability constant of a finite group: Part 1 of n by The central amenability constant of a finite group: Part 2 of n | Since it is not ...
https://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/the-central-amenability-constant-of-a-finite-group-part-1-of-n/comment-page-1/#comment-466
Fri, 14 Jun 2013 02:31:24 +0000http://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/?p=567#comment-466[…] continues from the previous post. I’ll also continue the experiment of writing things up in an anecdotal style, rather than in […]
]]>Comment on L’esprit d’escalier? by Ronnie Brown
https://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/2011/01/25/lesprit-descalier/comment-page-1/#comment-456
Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:43:51 +0000http://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/?p=289#comment-456It is maddening not to think of the right reply at the right moment! But when a visitor from Strasbourg to Bangor said to me in 2001 “You are not mainstream!” I came out with the reply: “Not yet!”. Actually I felt the work in which I had been involved since the 1960s went back to the root intuitions or sources of algebraic topology (What is a cycle? What is a boundary? Is there a higher dimensional nonabelian version of the fundamental group?etc, etc, …), so the question of where is the main stream has debatable answers.
]]>Comment on So what was Dr. Blind’s question, then? by Ronnie Brown
https://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/2013/01/24/so-what-was-dr-blinds-question-then/comment-page-1/#comment-455
Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:27:42 +0000http://ifwisdomwereteachable.wordpress.com/?p=557#comment-455I think many might find the fable about a table given on